Four questions. One stressful thought. An AI that holds the space so you don't have to hold it yourself. It won't let you slide past the part that actually matters.
Begin The Work →Byron Katie's process works. That's not in dispute. The problem is doing it alone. You write down a thought. "He doesn't care about me." "I'm not good enough." "I shouldn't have said that." Then you ask the first question and your mind immediately says yes, obviously it's true, that's why I wrote it down. And you move on. You skipped it. You didn't actually sit with the question long enough to feel anything shift.
Most people can't hold the inquiry for themselves. Not because they're bad at it. Because you can't simultaneously be the person being questioned and the person asking. The mind is too fast, too practiced at defending its positions. It knows where the exits are. It takes them.
This tool is the facilitator. It asks the question. It waits. If your answer is too fast or too clean, it asks again a different way. It doesn't rush you to the turnaround. It holds the space so you can stop protecting yourself for long enough to see what's actually there.
Start with the Judge Your Neighbor worksheet. Write down the thought exactly as it lives in you. Not cleaned up. Not softened. The AI takes it from there, one question at a time, in sequence.
If you answer question three in two sentences and move on, the AI notices. It sits with you on the question. Not pushback. Just presence. The same gentle insistence a good facilitator would use.
After the four questions comes the hardest part: finding three genuine examples of how the opposite might be true. The AI guides you through each turnaround without rushing, and doesn't accept "I can't think of anything" as an ending.
This is not a tool that tells you your feelings are wrong or that you should be more peaceful. It takes the thought seriously. It assumes you had a real reason to write it down. The inquiry follows from there.